| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: Hmm. Just a thing though - how exactly would an " unlimited source of BPCs" differ from a plain old BPO ? you said it right there, its in your words: "unlimited source of BPCs "... everybody would be able to have copies ...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.03 16:56:00
|
2. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
ok... i'm posting this more like a clarification statement because i have the feeling that some of my arguments are either misinterpreted or even dis'regarded - i'm not blaming anyone for doing that on purpose tho... i will try to keep it as short...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.03 13:42:00
|
3. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
about the single q. POLL i'm supporting - unfortunatelly poll features are not available for threads for now - maybe they'd upgrade the forums soon... RubyPorto wrote: There is no "right" compensation for something that's purchased for collec...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.03 01:58:00
|
4. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: Let's see what would happen if new T2 BPOs would get introduced .... So, really, there is no good way to introduce new T2 BPOs even if CCP wanted to introduce new ones. A "good way" being defined as causing more benefit than har...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.03 01:30:00
|
5. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: You're asking for the BPOs to be REMOVED.. no i'm not... i'm suggesting T2BPOs should be removed WITH the right COMPENSATION for the legit owners... altho you seems to consider otherwise, i'm not a fanatic but a very reso...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.02 06:22:00
|
6. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Tadeo Musashy wrote: errr... looks like you forgot to mention its a trade'able item and you could sell it anytime you want or you see fit to... so stop crying about the huge ROI time: investment is there anyway... all the ...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.02 04:20:00
|
7. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Ore Bunny wrote: Tadeo Musashy wrote: it remembers me of king's vanities in Paris's 17th century, or Tzar's attitude in old Rusia's early 1900... or 80-90 years latter Easter Europe - other times, other "Tzars", same attitude, same outcome...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.01 10:38:00
|
8. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: T2 BPOs do make very passive income for a very large price. For the time it takes to get a return on your investment, the capital could better be spent in other areas.[/i]..... errr... looks like you forgot to me...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.06.01 10:21:00
|
9. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Where in CCP's marketing have you ever seen the word "fair" or "just"? not very sure but... nowhere? there is a reason for that careless attitude towards "fair & just": marketing as well as services have the natural ten...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.31 08:11:00
|
10. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: Tadeo Musashy wrote: my "pro bpo removal" opinion / atitude comes from some twisted sense of justice/ fairness... same thing that makes me "hate" scammers and highsec gankers At least they have something very strong in commo...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.31 07:25:00
|
11. So, was everyone too busy whining about datacores to notice this? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Haulie Berry wrote: ...and? That doesn't sound like you're getting compensated to me. Sounds like, at best, they will simply make it marginally more competitive with FW - but make no mistake, it's never going to be what it was. who said any...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.31 00:25:00
|
12. So, was everyone too busy whining about datacores to notice this? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Haulie Berry wrote: And, like you, they will not be compensated - nor do they deserve to be. Thing is, the first rule is that the rules are going to change. In fact, that the rules change every six months or so is considered to be a fairly majo...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.30 23:53:00
|
13. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Tadeo Musashy wrote: i (myself that is) dont need a poll at all, any kind of poll... my mind is made long ago but i have a single vote and the option to cast it or not... ccp might need the poll... ccp might need the info a...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.30 09:10:00
|
14. So, was everyone too busy whining about datacores to notice this? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Haulie Berry wrote: Lutz Major wrote: Bye bye, nice and complex game play ... Welcome, mass-gaming suitable easy rules! Always wondered if anyone would be a big enough ******* to gripe about a basic arithmetic fix. Turns out I should...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.30 07:01:00
|
15. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: Tadeo Musashy wrote: as said before the one and only question that really matters for ALL of us is (as simple as this): What about the T2BPOs? followed by 3 click'able options to choose from should stay
should go...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.30 02:00:00
|
16. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: So just go answer the "poll" and prove him insignificant :P i've gave your "poll" a look and considering your resonable request quoted below Akita T wrote: "...PLEASE DO NOT DISCUSS THE ISSUE OF T2 BPOs IN THE POLL's ...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.29 23:52:00
|
17. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: The good bit about EVE in this issue is that it's not a democracy. The "dictator" (CCP) could certainly be swayed by the council (CSM) to some degree, if the council would have the majority backing of the public (the poll), but u...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.29 02:24:00
|
18. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Akita T wrote: Any reasonable poll on the topic would have to be a multi-question one, and it should include at a minimum the following questions and at a minimum the following choices: - what is your personal experience with invention (none, ...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.29 02:07:00
|
19. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Whoopsie. & Whoopsie number 2: i have revised my words carefully and havent saw anything really "over the bridge"... pls notice i've never said i'm not going to (decently) argue for my belifs, neither that my tongue is made of wood... its po...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.29 00:12:00
|
20. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: 1) I only did that after he accused me of lying. 2) Quite a few of your alts have the same arguments in the same writing style with similarly bad grammar/spelling as you. 0. my appologies for anyone bothered by this offtopi...
- by Tadeo Musashy - at 2012.05.28 15:00:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |